11 / Data-structure forensics

Beneath the visible record. Another layer of evidence.

Deep forensic examination of application metadata, database structures, storage media and RAM. Reconstruct digital traces and independently test evidential interpretations.

Application metadataDatabase structuresRAM & storage
WHO WE SUPPORT

Defence counsel, accused persons & authorised clients

WHAT WE EXAMINE

Software, operating-system, memory & storage artefacts

WHAT YOU RECEIVE

Source-linked reconstruction and technical forensic report

THE INVESTIGATIVE SCOPE

A file is a starting point. Its structure may change the question.

365 ALTERAM specialises in identifying, reconstructing and analysing deep digital traces within the fundamental architecture of software, operating systems and storage media. When a case requires analysis beyond visible logs or conventional extraction, we examine application-specific metadata, database indexes, raw records and relevant volatile memory to understand what the material actually supports.

01

What lies beneath the application view?

Examine relevant binary records, application metadata, database pages, indexes and transaction artefacts. Test format assumptions, software versions and the behaviour of tools used to decode or export the data. A displayed value is an interpretation that can require validation.

02

Can hidden or damaged traces be reconstructed?

Assess recoverable fragments and inconsistencies across application, database, operating-system and storage layers. Distinguish original bytes, decoded values, reconstructed relationships and inference. Record provenance and uncertainty; a residual fragment is not automatically a complete or committed record.

03

What does memory show, and what has it lost?

Examine lawfully acquired RAM captures for relevant transient and process artefacts. Record acquisition timing, collection effects and limits. Correlate fragments with other sources rather than inferring a complete action, a user or intent from isolated memory content.

04

Does a discrepancy establish manipulation?

Test suspected alteration against corruption, software behaviour, failed writes, synchronisation, incomplete exports and other reasonable explanations. Compare layers and timelines, document assumptions and report findings that support, weaken or leave unresolved the proposed account.

THE PURPOSE

From deep digital traces to an evidential account that can be independently tested.

HOW AN INSTRUCTION BEGINS

The BALANCE-7 approach
01 / DEFINE

The question
comes first.

We clarify the material issue, available records, authority and jurisdictions before proposing the work.

02 / EXAMINE

Evidence meets
independent scrutiny.

The agreed workstreams connect sources, test reasoning and identify what remains unresolved.

03 / REPORT

Findings return
to their sources.

Counsel receives a scoped record of the analysis, supporting exhibits and material limitations.

BEFORE YOU INSTRUCT

Clear questions.
Straight answers.

How does this relate to other digital forensic work?+

It is a specialist investigative focus within digital forensics, extending beyond a particular extraction or application view where the case requires it. Other qualified digital forensic practitioners may also undertake low-level structural and memory analysis; the appropriate depth depends on the question and available material.

Can you recover every deleted or corrupted item?+

No. Recovery depends on what was preserved and remains technically accessible. Overwriting, encryption, loss of volatile memory and incomplete acquisition may prevent reconstruction. A report must state those limits rather than promise complete recovery.

Will the findings be legally admissible?+

Our objective is a clear, source-linked record suitable for legal scrutiny, with handling history, integrity checks, analytical methods and limitations documented. Admissibility depends on the applicable law and the competent court. Qualified counsel directs legal strategy and use of the findings.

Can this support another account of the evidence?+

Yes, where the material supports it. We test the existing interpretation alongside reasonable alternatives and report supportive, adverse and inconclusive findings consistently. We do not manufacture an alternative conclusion or guarantee an outcome.

Work is limited to lawfully obtained material and an agreed mandate. Technical interpretations require appropriate specialist competence. No recovery, completeness, finding or legal outcome is guaranteed.

LET’S EXAMINE THE QUESTION

Start with
what needs
a second look.

Tell us the jurisdiction, key date and the data-structure forensics question you need examined.

contact@365alteram.com +44 (0)20 4544 6626

Use a brief, neutral summary. Evidence transfer and any confidentiality arrangements are agreed separately.

Truth. Evidence. Justice.
INITIAL ENQUIRY365 ALTERAM / PRIVATE INSTRUCTION

Discuss your matter.

Prepare an email to our team. Your email app opens for you to review and send it.

No files are uploaded. Nothing is submitted by this page.

An enquiry does not create an engagement. Professional assessments are scoped and chargeable. Privacy policy ↗

FICTIONAL CASE STUDIES

Independent review in practice

Invented educational scenarios, not actual client matters or promised results.

Explore all ten cases →