Case Studies
International scenarios illustrating how original sources, competing explanations and independent specialist review can change the understanding of a criminal allegation.
The right to be heard becomes meaningful when the evidence can be examined. These original fictional scenarios show favourable, adverse and unresolved findings, including narrower convictions and matters requiring further investigation. They are not client results or examples reproduced from Stefano Ruggeri’s book. Procedures and evidential decisions depend on the relevant jurisdiction.
Fictional case 01 · Telecommunications and mobile data forensics
The defence can test a location allegation meaningfully only when it can examine the records and reasoning behind the map. A reasoned decision must address the limits of both location and user attribution.
Explore the Case
Fictional case 02 · Narcotics investigations and forensic review
Hearing the defence exposes a gap between proving what a container held and proving what its driver knew. The alternative explanation must be tested against the same records as the allegation.
Explore the Case
Fictional case 03 · White collar crime forensic review
A complete defence investigation may narrow responsibility while confirming an offence. Hearing both sides enables a decision grounded in individual conduct, rather than a person's position on an organisation chart.
Explore the Case
Fictional case 04 · Cryptocurrency fraud and organised crime investigations
A transaction path can support a financial connection without identifying the person who controlled each address. Effective participation requires access to the assumptions that turned a diagram into an allegation of ownership.
Explore the Case
Fictional case 05 · Aviation investigations and forensic review
A signature must be connected to the document version and information available when it was given. Meaningful defence participation allows the court to examine that connection before drawing conclusions about knowledge.
Explore the Case
Fictional case 06 · Arms and weapons related forensic review
An expert opinion about an object's characteristics cannot repair a missing link between that object and the accused. Both the technical identification and the alleged individual role require examination.
Explore the Case
Fictional case 07 · War crimes investigations and forensic review
The seriousness of an allegation makes accurate individual attribution essential. Defence participation must permit examination of original sources, translations and dependencies between reports while respecting witnesses and victims.
Explore the Case
Fictional case 08 · INTERPOL notices and CCF support
A person affected by an international alert needs an effective route to place verifiable corrections before the competent reviewing body. This administrative review illustrates the wider value of hearing the affected person's evidence, without being equated to a criminal trial.
Explore the Case
Fictional case 09 · Oil and gas fraud with maritime and offshore forensic review
A fair hearing requires scrutiny of technical calculations as well as the defence explanation. Independent investigation can correct an overstated allegation while preserving evidence that supports a narrower conviction.
Explore the Case
Fictional case 10 · Corporate extortion and organised crime investigations
The right to be heard includes a meaningful opportunity to restore missing context. A complete record may undermine a leadership allegation while still supporting responsibility for particular acts.
Explore the CaseFor source-led analysis of public cases, visit The Forensic Journal →
Before you trust the file, test it.
365 ALTERAM supports criminal defence lawyers, individuals facing allegations and their authorised representatives through independent forensic review. Begin with a neutral summary and the jurisdictions involved. A suitable channel for sensitive material can be agreed after initial contact.
Request a Confidential Case Assessment