Unauthorised access, credential attacks, covert system entry or leaked-data markets
Ethics & independence
Independence must survive the inconvenient finding.
Professional counterweight is credible only when supportive, adverse and inconclusive findings are assessed to the same standard.
Outcome neutrality
We do not prove innocence. We determine what the available record does—and does not—support.
A client may disagree with a finding. Counsel may identify legal context or factual error. Neither can purchase a different professional conclusion.
Non-negotiable boundaries
Methods that compromise the record are not investigative tools.
Payment for a desired witness account, pressure, intimidation or concealed contact
Tracking, recording or surveillance outside explicit local authority
Destruction, alteration, selective withholding or misdescription of material
A fee, bonus or commercial concession linked to a legal or public outcome
Public case commentary without documented counsel instruction and ethics approval
Independent challenge
Quality and conduct concerns must have a route outside delivery.
Complaints concerning legality, privacy, factual accuracy, researcher conduct, conflicts or methodology are separated from ordinary commercial disputes and reviewed outside the matter team.
No person is penalised for raising a good-faith concern. Where a finding or method requires correction, the decision and the effect on prior work are documented.
ethics@365alteram.com