Practical equality of investigative capacity.
A defence team should be able to understand, reproduce and professionally challenge the evidence placed against its client.
The firm
Built to test evidence, not to sell a conclusion.
365 ALTERAM is an independent forensic review and defence-support firm designed for complex international matters where scale, data and jurisdictional fragmentation can distort the search for truth.
Our position
We sit between counsel, forensic specialists and authorised investigators—without taking over the role of any of them.
The distinction is evidence engineering: converting dispersed material into a source-led record, defining testable hypotheses, coordinating specialist review and reporting conclusions with their limitations visible.
Reliable scrutiny through controlled method.
We test evidence, assumptions and investigative methods and place supportive and qualifying material in one auditable framework.
Standards
The conclusion is only as credible as the conduct behind it.
Independence
The instruction defines the question, never the desired conclusion.
Lawfulness
No method without documented authority, basis and proportionality.
Neutrality
Supportive and adverse findings face the same evidentiary threshold.
Reproducibility
A qualified third party should be able to follow source, method and conclusion.
Discretion
Need-to-know access, controlled communication and data minimisation.
Courage
The client account is tested as rigorously as the official theory.
Why ALTERAM
Audi alteram partem.
“Hear the other side” is an old principle with modern operational force. It does not presume that the other account is correct. It requires that material propositions are capable of meaningful challenge before a conclusion becomes institutional fact.
365 reflects permanence: evidence discipline is not a campaign used only when attention is high. It is a professional standard maintained every day of the year.