Method note
Alternative hypotheses without counter-tunnel vision
MethodologyA practical model for translating competing explanations into predictions, disconfirmers and disciplined evidence questions.
ForthcomingIdeas & analysis
Sharper methods create fairer scrutiny.
Our insights examine evidence integrity, disclosure, forensic method and the practical defence-capacity gap in international proceedings.
Founding paper
The Defence Evidence Gap in Cross-Border Cases
An institutional analysis of how data volume, fragmented jurisdictions and specialist scarcity can create practical inequality even where procedural rights formally exist.
Publication programme · 2026Technical note
Client-provided is not the same as authentic
Digital evidenceThe minimum provenance, hash, transfer and working-copy controls required when digital material arrives through the defence team.
ForthcomingCounsel briefing
Privilege architecture in multi-country reviews
GovernanceHow instructions, distribution, workstreams and country-specific assumptions should be mapped before a forensic review begins.
ForthcomingPractice note
When translation becomes evidence
Document integrityWhy contested terminology demands source context, independent linguistic review and a visible record of ambiguity.
ForthcomingQuality note
The report should show its limits
ReportingA conclusion is stronger, not weaker, when assumptions, excluded material, uncertainty and unresolved questions are visible.
Forthcoming