13 / Cryptocurrency fraud
Global cryptocurrency fraud investigations: blockchain transaction tracing, wallet attribution and forensic evidence review of suspected organised criminal networks.
Businesses, legal counsel & authorised representatives
Transactions, wallet control, corporate roles & evidential links
Reproducible transaction analysis and source-indexed forensic dossier
THE INVESTIGATIVE SCOPE
365 ALTERAM provides independent forensic investigation and evidence review in alleged large-scale cryptocurrency fraud involving businesses, investment operations and suspected organised criminal networks worldwide. We connect available blockchain records with commercial documents, platform data, communications and financial evidence to reconstruct what happened and test who directed, controlled or benefited from the conduct. We support affected businesses, authorised representatives and legal counsel, and independently review allegations for defence teams subject to conflict checks. A transaction trail is the starting point of an investigation, not a substitute for proof of individual responsibility.
Reconstruct alleged investment and token-offering fraud, fictitious trading returns, misappropriated custody assets, exchange misconduct and fraudulent corporate crypto transactions. Compare investor communications, contracts, platform statements, accounting records and available blockchain activity. Distinguish deception or diversion supported by evidence from volatility, business failure, software error or a commercial dispute.
Trace available transfers across relevant wallets, tokens, smart contracts, exchanges and bridges, recording network, transaction hash, block reference, timestamp conventions, token identifiers and analytical steps. Examine fees, swaps and internal platform entries where records are supplied. State gaps, tool dependencies and uncertainty; a public blockchain does not disclose every off-chain ledger movement or the identity behind an address.
Compare transaction records with lawfully obtained account and identity records, device artefacts, communications, signing arrangements, company registers and decision records. Test wallet-clustering assumptions and competing explanations. An address label, common transaction pattern, exchange deposit or technical association alone does not establish ownership, individual control, knowledge or criminal intent.
Map suspected coordination, division of roles, shared infrastructure, corporate intermediaries, repeated schemes and distribution of proceeds across jurisdictions. Grade each relationship by source quality and evidential strength. Test the alleged role of promoters, directors, developers, custodians and facilitators individually, and report contradictory material and unresolved gaps alongside supportive findings.
Connect the on-chain trail to an independently testable account of the underlying conduct.
HOW AN INSTRUCTION BEGINS
The BALANCE-7 approachWe clarify the material issue, available records, authority and jurisdictions before proposing the work.
The agreed workstreams connect sources, test reasoning and identify what remains unresolved.
Counsel receives a scoped record of the analysis, supporting exhibits and material limitations.
BEFORE YOU INSTRUCT
Engagements can address alleged investment schemes, token-offering misrepresentations, diversion of corporate or customer assets, exchange or custody misconduct and related laundering allegations. Scope depends on the networks, formats, available records, lawful authority and appropriate specialist competence.
No. Blockchain records describe transactions and addresses, not a complete verified identity. Attribution may require corroborating account, device, corporate or communications records obtained through lawful channels. We distinguish observations, analytical hypotheses and verified links.
This service investigates evidence; it does not guarantee asset recovery, reversal or freezing. Counsel and duly authorised bodies direct legal remedies, disclosure requests and any preservation or recovery process. We can provide a documented transaction chronology and factual dossier within the agreed scope.
Yes. We can examine supplied source records, address labels, clustering assumptions, tool outputs and the reasoning connecting transactions to a person or criminal allegation. Methods, data coverage, uncertainty and reasonable alternative explanations are recorded.
Begin with a neutral summary, the relevant jurisdictions, known networks and your professional capacity. Do not send private keys, seed phrases, passwords or sensitive case files in an initial enquiry. The form prepares an email for your review; evidence transfer is arranged separately after intake.
Work uses lawfully available or authorised material under an agreed mandate. We document evidential provenance, chain of custody, integrity checks, reproducible analytical steps and material limitations. No identity attribution, recovery, admissibility or legal outcome is guaranteed. Legal strategy and representation remain with qualified counsel.
LET’S EXAMINE THE QUESTION
Tell us the jurisdiction, key date and the cryptocurrency fraud question you need examined.
contact@365alteram.com +44 (0)20 4544 6626Use a brief, neutral summary. Evidence transfer and any confidentiality arrangements are agreed separately.
Truth. Evidence. Justice.FICTIONAL CASE STUDIES
Invented educational scenarios, not actual client matters or promised results.
Explore all ten cases →
